EBITDA
(Earnings Before Interest Taxes Depreciation and Amortization) leaves in, or
adds in if necessary, an expense for a General Manager to run the operation and
does not recognize Discretionary Expenses as being discretionary.
This is
why a “multiple” used in an EBITDA evaluation is usually higher than one used
in a Cash Flow evaluation. The reason
being is with the EBITDA measurement, because there is “management in place”,
the buyer is buying a “passive” investment.
Hence, the Buyer is generally prepared to pay a higher multiple (and
earn a smaller return on their investment).
The
following example of the same Business highlights the point:
EBITDA | CASH FLOW | |||
Net Profit | $800,000 | $800,000 | ||
Adjustment for GM at FMV (fair market value) | -$150,000 | not applicable | ||
Adjustment for Discretionary Expenses | not applicable | $110,000 | ||
Adjusted Net Profit | $650,000 | $910,000 | ||
Multiple | x4.14 | x2.93 | ||
Value of Business | $2,691,000 | $2,666,300 |
This
subtle but significant difference between “multiple” in these two methods can
mean a big difference if the wrong “multiple” is applied to the wrong
measurement. For example, an EBITDA
multiple of 4.14 applied to a Cash Flow Adjusted Net Profit measurement of
$910,000 will grossly overstate the value of the business.
Typically
you will find the majority of businesses in “Main Street” transactions
generally have an Adjusted Net Profit of $600,000 or less, and typically have
the owner as the operator of the business reaping the benefits of the
Discretionary Expenses.
Do you have a small business question
you would like answered about this article or others?
Bill Sivell is a salesperson with VR
Windsor Inc. [www.vrwindsor.com]
519-903-7807, which sells businesses to buyers across Canada and around the
world. His 14-year career includes diverse senior management positions in
marketing, advertising, sales management and operations management. His blog
appears every Tuesday.
No comments:
Post a Comment